the firm  ::  expertise  ::  lawyers  ::  library  ::  news  ::  malta  ::  careers  ::  contact us

     
 images/photos/amerfootball.gif

gaming law practice group > technical requirements

EU & International Gaming Law Update

     

 general

 

 i-gaming unit

 

 regulations

 

 the process

 

 technical testing

 

 taxation

 

 the regulator

 

 benefits

 

 EU aspects

 

 new draft regulations

 

 news

 
     
 

Many states are moving in the opposite direction from the one recently taken by the EU, which was acting primarily on the provisions of the Treaty of the EU and on standing ECJ case law. The Gambelli ruling [C-243/01, 6th November 2003] unequivocally affirmed gambling as a service, a sector subject to the Freedom of establishment (Article 43) and the Freedom to provide services (Article 49).

France, Italy and Austria are the countries that are mainly protecting their monopolistic powers. On 12/10/2006, the EU Commission issued issued a press release entitled 'Commission inquires into restrictions on the provision of certain gambling services in Austria, France and Italy'.

It is being stated that Charles Mcreevy, the EU internal market commissioner will launch infringement procedures against the three countries for violating EU rules. This follows other similar actions taken in April.

The European Commission is considering legal action against France as early as next month over its restrictions on gambling operators. This was a follow-up to the arrest in France of two senior executives of Bwin, the Austrian online sports betting operator on September 15. The latter were in the process of signing a sponsorship deal with AS Monaco. The operation, carried out on the behest of the state monopoly Français des Jeux, was calculated to attain maximum publicity.

On 15 September, the French authorities detained Manfred Bodner and Norbert Teufelberger, the two Austrian chief executives of online gambling operator Bwin (formerly Betandwin), as they travelled to France to unveil a new sponsorship deal with Monaco football club. Coming after the high profile arrests of David Carruthers and Peter Dicks in the United States, it is another serious blow to the industry. Under French law it is illegal for gambling operators to advertise, unless they are a French state-owned company.

It is particularly striking that, from reports, it appears to have been Francaise Des Jeux ("FDJ"), the state-owned monopoly operator of the French national lottery, who prompted the authorities into making the arrest. It has also warned that, just like in the US, other operators who travel to France are in danger of arrest.

Bodner and Teufelberger have now been released on bail. However, whilst no charges have been brought and the investigation is likely to take several months, the pair have been informed that they could face up to three years in prison. This will be of particular concern to 888 and Gamebookers, each of which have current shirt sponsorship deals with French football clubs. Further to this, it is understood that both Monaco and Nantes played their most recent matches in kit which did not incorporate the gambling-related logos of their sponsors.

The argument upheld by the French authorities is that Bwin has violated French territorial gaming laws, which ban private sports betting businesses from operating in the country.

The EU Internal Market spokesman for Commissioner Charlier McCreevy claims that: "We continue to receive complaints and Commissioner McCreevy intends to proceed with these cases and initiate additional cases against other member states, including France."

The spokesman warned that criminal sanctions against individual executives, based on laws against illegal gambling, could in themselves be "problematic" from the Commission's point of view: "If national rules on gambling are incompatible with Community Law, criminal sanctions associated with the breach of these national rules can also be problematical from a single market perspective." EU law provides that governments have the right to place restrictions on gambling and sports betting operators, however these restrictions have to be "non-discriminatory, proportionate and consistent". Mr McCreevy's spokesman said: "It is not acceptable to limit the freedom to provide betting services on account of protecting consumers and at the same time allow monopoly holders to advertise betting services."

It has been reported that the arrest of the Austrian executives had raised the stakes in a Europe-wide battle between lucrative state-sponsored betting monopolies and their upstart rivals on the Internet, raising eyebrows at the Commission. This move was parallel to another similar action in the US where two British online gambling executives were arrested.  While the US resists i-gaming on religious and moral grounds, European opposition has resulted largely from a desire to protect government-sponsored monopolies that generate more than €25 billion in annual income (International Herald Tribune).

Online gambling has attracted about five per cent of the global gaming business. Due to the increase in the popularity of gaming, the overall pot is growing. It is believed that the expansion in this sector is not affecting monopolies but is attracting new customers.

With the arrest of the two Austrian executive, a wave of shock was expressed by various organisations such as the European Betting Association (EBA). Bwin is a licensed, regulated company and a member of EBA in various EU member states and has been listed on the Vienna stock exchange since March 2000. EBA secretary general Didier Dewun sees the move as "a provocation and the desperate last resort of a dying monopoly" and called on the EU Commission to take urgent action.

See also:

 

Property & Residence

Doing Business in Malta

Estates, Probate & Wills

Permanent Residence

 

Tax & Corporate

Company Formation

Taxation

Trusts & Trustees

 

Finance

Banking

Captive Insurance

Funds

Investment Services

 

Technology

Intellectual Property

e-Business

e-Gaming

Trademarks & Patents